Abdominal wall surgery units accreditation. The Spanish model.

The Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC) deems it essential to define and regulate the acquisition of high-specialization competencies within General Surgery and Gastrointestinal Surgery and proposes the Regulation for the accreditation of specialized surgical units. The AEC aims to define specialized surgical units as those functional elements of the health system that meet the defined requirements regarding their provision, solvency, and specialization in care, teaching, and research. In this paper we present the proposed accreditation model for Abdominal Wall Surgery Units, as well as the results of a survey conducted to assess the status of such units in our country. The model presented represents one of the pioneering initiatives worldwide concerning the accreditation of Abdominal Wall Surgery Units.

Open vs. minimally invasive sublay incisional hernia repair. Is there a risk of overtreatment? EVEREG registry analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Incisional hernia (IH) is a very common surgical procedure. Registries provide real world data. The objective is to analyze the open and minimally invasive (MIS) sublay technique (with or without associated components separation [CS]) in IH cases from the EVEREG registry and to evaluate the evolution over time of the techniques. METHODS: All patients in EVEREG from July 2012 to December 2021 were included. The characteristics of the patients, IH, surgical technique, complications and mortality in the first 30 days were collected. We analyzed Group 1 (open sublay vs MIS sublay, without CS), Group 2 (open sublay vs MIS sublay, with CS) and Group 3 where the evolution of open and MIS techniques was evaluated over time. RESULTS: 4867 IH were repaired using a sublay technique. Group 1: 3739 (77%) open surgery, mostly midline hernias combined (P = .016) and 55 (1%) MIS, mostly lateral hernias (LH) (P = .000). Group 2: 1049 (21.5%) open surgery and 24 (0.5%) MIS. A meaningful difference (P = .006) was observed in terms of transverse diameters (5.9 (SD 2.1) cm for the MIS technique and 10.11 (SD 4.8) for the open technique). The LH MIS associated more CS (P = .002). There was an increase in the use of the sublay technique over time (with or without CS). CONCLUSION: Increased use of the sublay technique (open and MIS) over time. For some type of hernia (LH) the MIS sublay technique with associated CS may have represented an overtreatment.

Umbilical incisional hernias (M3): are trocar-site hernias different? Comparative analysis of the EVEREG registry⋆.

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia (HI), in open and laparoscopic surgery, is a very frequent complication. HI located in the umbilical region are called M3. The main aim of this study is to compare HI produced by the placement of an umbilical laparoscopic trocar (M3T) with those located in M3 in open surgery (M3O) in terms of basal characteristics, complications and recurrences; and secondarily the identification of risk factors. METHOD: Cross-sectional observational study based on the national prospective registry EVEREG during the period of July 2012-June 2018. The main variables were recurrences and postoperative complications. Both groups (M3T and M3O) were compared. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify the risk factors of the entire cohort. RESULTS: 882 had a follow-up time longer than 12 months. M3O group presented superior ASA-Class, more complex HI and previous repair. It also presented a higher recurrence rate at 12 and 24 months (8.6% vs. 2.5%; P < 0,0001 and 9.3% vs. 2.9%; P < 0.0001) and higher postoperative complications rate (21.9% vs. 14.6 %; P = 0.02). Previous repair, intervention length and associated procedures requirement were identified as risk factors for postoperative complications. Absence of a specialist present during surgery, previous repair, and the absence of complications were identified as risk factors for recurrence. In the PSM analysis no differences were detected in of complications and recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: HI M3O is more complex than M3T. The complexity is not related to the origin of the hernia but to its characteristics and those of the patient.

Reparación de la hernia paraestomal. Estudio observacional prospectivo basado en el Registro Español de Hernia Incisional (EVEREG) / Parestomal hernia repair. Prospective observational study based on the Spanish Registry of Incisional Hernia (EVEREG)

Introducción: Los resultados de la reparación de la hernia paraestomal (HP) basados en datos provenientes de registros son escasos. El objetivo del presente trabajo es analizar los datos recogidos sobre la HP en el Registro Nacional de Hernia Incisional (EVEREG) y así evaluar las prácticas actuales y resultados en la reparación de una HP. Métodos: Se analizan los datos de la cohorte de HP registradas en el período desde julio de 2012 hasta junio de 2018. Se analizan las complicaciones, recidivas y factores asociados a ellas de la cohorte completa de HP, independientemente del tipo de estoma al que se asocian. Posteriormente, se realiza el mismo análisis del grupo de HP con relación a una colostomía (grupo más numeroso). Resultados: Se estudiaron 353 HP. De estas, 259 (73%) fueron HP en el contexto de una colostomía terminal, 74 (21%) en el de una ileostomía terminal y 20 (6%) en el de una ureteroileostomía (Bricker). La edad media global fue de 68,7±11,1 años y 135 (38%) pacientes fueron del sexo femenino. El abordaje abierto y la cirugía electiva fueron predominantes (78% y 92%, respectivamente). El 99% se reparó con una malla sintética no absorbible. Las complicaciones postoperatorias globales fueron altas (30,6%), así como la recurrencia global (27,5%) tras un seguimiento medio de 9,4 meses. Conclusiones: La reparación de la HP es poco frecuente comparada con el conjunto de reparaciones de la hernia incisional. La cirugía de la HP parece relacionarse con un porcentaje elevado de complicaciones postoperatorias y recidiva. (AU)

Introduction: The results of parastomal hernia (PH) repair based on data from registries are scarce. The objective of this work is to analyze the data collected on PH in the National Registry of Incisional Hernia (EVEREG) and thus evaluate current practices and results in PH repair. Methods: Data from the PH cohort recorded in the period from July 2012 to June 2018 are analyzed. Complications, recurrences and associated factors of the entire PH cohort are analyzed, regardless of the type of stoma they are associated with. Subsequently, the same PH group analysis was performed in relation to a colostomy (larger group). Results: 353 PH were studied. Of these, 259 (73%) were HP in the context of a terminal colostomy, 74 (21%) in the context of a terminal ileostomy, and 20 (6%) in the context of a ureteroileostomy (Bricker). The global mean age was 68.7±11.1 years and 135 (38%) patients were female. The open approach and elective surgery were predominant (78% and 92% respectively); 99% were repaired with a non-absorbable synthetic mesh. Global postoperative complications were high (30.6%). As well as, the global recurrence (27.5%) after a mean follow-up of 9.4 months. Conclusions: PH repair is infrequent. PH surgery seems to be associated with a high percentage of postoperative complications and recurrence. (AU)

Parestomal hernia repair. Prospective observational study based on the Spanish Registry of Incisional Hernia (EVEREG).

INTRODUCTION: The results of parastomal hernia (PH) repair based on data from registries are scarce. The objective of this work is to analyze the data collected on PH in the National Registry of Incisional Hernia (EVEREG) and thus evaluate current practices and results in PH repair. METHODS: Data from the PH cohort recorded in the period from July 2012 to June 2018 are analyzed. Complications, recurrences and associated factors of the entire PH cohort are analyzed, regardless of the type of stoma they are associated with. Subsequently, the same PH group analysis was performed in relation to a colostomy (larger group). RESULTS: 353 PH were studied. Of these, 259 (73%) were PH in the context of a terminal colostomy, 74 (21%) in the context of a terminal ileostomy, and 20 (6%) in the context of a ureteroileostomy (Bricker). The global mean age was 68.7 ± 11.1 years and 135 (38%) patients were female. The open approach and elective surgery were predominant (78% and 92% respectively); 99% were repaired with a non-absorbable synthetic mesh. Global postoperative complications were high (30.6%). As well as, the global recurrence (27.5%) after a mean follow-up of 9.4 months. CONCLUSIONS: PH repair is infrequent. PH surgery seems to be associated with a high percentage of postoperative complications and recurrence.

Umbilical incisional hernia (M3) Are trocar hernia differents? Comparative analysis of the EVEREG Registry. / Hernia incisional umbilical (M3). ¿Son diferentes las hernias de trócar? Análisis comparativo del registro EVEREG.

INTRODUCTION: Incisional hernia (HI), in open and laparoscopic surgery, is a very frequent complication. HI located in the umbilical region are called M3. The main aim of this study is to compare HI produced by the placement of an umbilical laparoscopic trocar (M3T) with those located in M3 in open surgery (M3O) in terms of basal characteristics, complications and recurrences; and secondarily the identification of risk factors. METHOD: Cross-sectional observational study based on the national prospective registry EVEREG during the period of July 2012 - June 2018. The main variables were recurrences and postoperative complications. Both groups (M3T and M3O) were compared. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify the risk factors of the entire cohort. RESULTS: 882 had a follow-up time longer than 12 months. M3O group presented superior ASA-Class, more complex HI and previous repair. It also presented a higher recurrence rate at 12 and 24 months (8.6 vs. 2.5%; p < 0,0001 and 9.3 vs. 2.9%; p < 0.0001) and higher postoperative complications rate (21.9 vs. 14.6%; p = 0.02). Previous repair, intervention length and associated procedures requirement were identified as risk factors for postoperative complications. Absence of a specialist present during surgery, previous repair, and the absence of complications were identified as risk factors for recurrence. In the PSM analysis no differences were detected in of complications and recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: HI M3O is more complex than M3T. The complexity is not related to the origin of the hernia but to its characteristics and those of the patient.

Factores de riesgo de mala evolución en la reparación de hernias incisionales: Lecciones aprendidas del Registro Nacional de Hernia Incisional (EVEREG) / Risk factors for bad outcomes in incisional hernia repair: Lessons learned from the National Registry of Incisional Hernia (EVEREG)

INTRODUCCIÓN: Los registros son herramientas potentes para identificar situaciones de riesgo de mala evolución. Nuestro objetivo ha sido analizar los datos del Registro Nacional de Hernia Incisional (EVEREG) para detectar situaciones de riesgo para el desarrollo de complicaciones y recidivas. MÉTODOS: Se analizan los datos de la cohorte de hernias registradas en el período desde julio de 2012 hasta junio de 2014. Se realiza una comparación estadística entre las hernias que presentaron complicaciones y recidivas, y su relación con los pacientes, las características de las hernias y la técnica quirúrgica, para determinar cuáles de ellos pueden predecir malos resultados. RESULTADOS: En el período de estudio disponemos de datos de 1.336 hernias (43,7% varones; 56,3% mujeres), con una edad media de 63,6 años (DE: 12,4) e IMC de 30,4 (DE: 5,4). En el estudio multivariante las variables asociadas a la presencia de complicaciones fueron: edad superior a 70 años, neoplasia, longitud del defecto mayor de 10 cm, reparación previa y resección intestinal. Las variables asociadas a recidiva fueron: las hernias paraestomales, la reparación previa, la cirugía urgente, la aparición de complicaciones postoperatorias y la reintervención quirúrgica. El uso de una separación de componentes fue el único factor protector en este tipo de análisis (OR: 0,438; IC: 0,27-0,71; p = 0,001). CONCLUSIONES: La presencia de factores de riesgo para la aparición de complicaciones y recurrencias debe ser tenida en cuenta con el fin de proyectar la prehabilitación del paciente para la cirugía, planificar la técnica quirúrgica y su derivación a unidades especializadas

INTRODUCTION: Registries are powerful tools for identifying factors predicting bad results. Our objective was to analyse data from the Spanish Registry of Incisional Hernia (EVEREG) to detect risk situations for the development of complications and recurrences. METHODS: We have analysed data of the cohort of hernias registered during the period from July 2012 to June 2014. We have compared the data between complicated and non-complicated patients in the short and long term follow-up. Data compared were: patient demographics, comorbid condition, hernia defect characteristics and surgical technique to determine which of them may be predictors of poor outcomes. RESULTS: During the period of study, we collected data from 1,336 hernias (43.7% males; 56.3% females) with a mean age of 63.6 years (SD 12.4) and BMI of 30.4 (SD 5.4). In the multivariate analysis, factors associated with complications were: age >70 years, previous neoplasm, diameter greater than 10cm, previous repair and bowel resection. Factors related with recurrences were: parastomal hernia, previous repair, emergency repair, postoperative complications and reoperation. A separation of components was the only protective factor for this type of analysis (OR 0.438; CI 0.27-0.71; p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for the development of complications and recurrences must be considered for promoting preoperative patient prehabilitation, planning the surgical technique and referring patients to specialized abdominal wall units

Risk factors for bad outcomes in incisional hernia repair: Lessons learned from the National Registry of Incisional Hernia (EVEREG). / Factores de riesgo de mala evolución en la reparación de hernias incisionales: Lecciones aprendidas del Registro Nacional de Hernia Incisional (EVEREG).

INTRODUCTION: Registries are powerful tools for identifying factors predicting bad results. Our objective was to analyse data from the Spanish Registry of Incisional Hernia (EVEREG) to detect risk situations for the development of complications and recurrences. METHODS: We have analysed data of the cohort of hernias registered during the period from July 2012 to June 2014. We have compared the data between complicated and non-complicated patients in the short and long term follow-up. Data compared were: patient demographics, comorbid condition, hernia defect characteristics and surgical technique to determine which of them may be predictors of poor outcomes. RESULTS: During the period of study, we collected data from 1,336 hernias (43.7% males; 56.3% females) with a mean age of 63.6 years (SD 12.4) and BMI of 30.4 (SD 5.4). In the multivariate analysis, factors associated with complications were: age >70 years, previous neoplasm, diameter greater than 10cm, previous repair and bowel resection. Factors related with recurrences were: parastomal hernia, previous repair, emergency repair, postoperative complications and reoperation. A separation of components was the only protective factor for this type of analysis (OR 0.438; CI 0.27-0.71; p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for the development of complications and recurrences must be considered for promoting preoperative patient prehabilitation, planning the surgical technique and referring patients to specialized abdominal wall units.

Contemporary concepts in hernia prevention: Selected proceedings from the 2017 International Symposium on Prevention of Incisional Hernias.

Incisional hernia is a frequent complication of midline laparotomy and enterostomal creation and is associated with high morbidity, decreased quality of life, and high costs. The International Symposium on Incisional Hernia Prevention was held October 19-20, 2017, at the InterContinental Hotel in San Francisco, CA, hosted by the Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco. One hundred and three attendees included general and plastic surgeons from 9 countries, including principal participants for several of the seminal studies in the field. Over the course of the 2-day meeting, there were 38 oral presentations, 3 keynote lectures, and 2 panel discussions. The Symposium was a combination of new information but also a comprehensive review of the existing data so as to assess the current state of the field and to set the stage for future research. Further, the Symposium sought to increase awareness and thus emphasize the importance of preventing the formation of incisional and enterostomal hernias.

Incisional hernia prevention and use of mesh. A narrative review. / Profilaxis de la hernia incisional y utilización de mallas. Revisión narrativa.

Incisional hernias are a very common problem, with an estimated incidence around 15-20% of all laparotomies. Evisceration is another important problem, with a lower rate (2.5-3%) but severe consequences for patients. Prevention of both complications is an essential objective of correct patient treatment due to the improved quality of life and cost savings. This narrative review intends to provide an update on incisional hernia and evisceration prevention. We analyze the current criteria for proper abdominal wall closure and the possibility to add prosthetic reinforcement in certain cases requiring it. Parastomal, trocar-site hernias and hernias developed after stoma closure are included in this review.

Profilaxis de la hernia incisional y utilización de mallas. Revisión narrativa / Incisional hernia prevention and use of mesh. A narrative review

La hernia incisional es una patología muy común cuya incidencia se estima en torno al 15-20% de todas las laparotomías. La evisceración es otro problema importante, con una incidencia menor (2,5-3%) pero con graves consecuencias para el paciente. Por todo ello, la prevención de ambas complicaciones surge como un objetivo fundamental para el tratamiento correcto de los pacientes, por la mejora de la calidad de vida y por el ahorro de costes que supondría. Esta revisión narrativa pretende realizar una puesta al día en la prevención de la hernia incisional y la evisceración. Se analizan los criterios actuales para el cierre correcto de la pared abdominal, seguido de la posibilidad de añadir refuerzos protésicos en aquellos pacientes o casos que así lo requieran. Eventraciones especiales, como las originadas tras la inserción de trócares de laparoscopia o las secundarias a la realización de un estoma, se incluyen también en este trabajo (AU)

Incisional hernias are a very common problem, with an estimated incidence around 15-20% of all laparotomies. Evisceration is another important problem, with a lower rate (2.5-3%) but severe consequences for patients. Prevention of both complications is an essential objective of correct patient treatment due to the improved quality of life and cost savings. This narrative review intends to provide an update on incisional hernia and evisceration prevention. We analyze the current criteria for proper abdominal wall closure and the possibility to add prosthetic reinforcement in certain cases requiring it. Parastomal, trocar-site hernias and hernias developed after stoma closure are included in this review (AU)

Resultados iniciales del Registro Español de Hernia Incisional / Initial results of the National Registry of Incisional Hernia

INTRODUCCIÓN: El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar los datos recopilados en el Registro Nacional de Hernia Incisional (EVEREG) para conocer la situación actual del tratamiento de esta dolencia en España. MÉTODOS: EVEREG es una base de datos prospectiva online en la que, desde julio de 2012, se registraron de forma anónima los datos de las hernias incisionales intervenidas en España. RESULTADOS: Hasta marzo de 2015, se han registrado 4.501 hernias en 95 de los 113 hospitales inscritos. La edad media de los casos fue de 62,7 años, un 56,5% mujeres, con un IMC medio de 30,2 kg/m2 y un 29,8% de ellos con riesgo quirúrgico elevado (ASA III-V). Un 93,7% de las intervenciones fueron electivas, el 88,3% por cirugía abierta y el 22,2% fueron hernias recurrentes. El 66,9% correspondían a una hernia tras laparotomía media, en el 81,4% el diámetro transversal fue menor de 10 cm. Se empleó una prótesis en el 96,2% de los casos. La estancia postoperatoria fue de 5,3 días, con complicaciones en el 29,1% y con una mortalidad del 0,8%. Tras una mediana de seguimiento de 7,7 meses se ha detectado un elevado índice de recurrencias (20,7% al año), sobre todo en hernias intervenidas tras una reparación previa (18,1% primarias vs. 30,6% recidivadas; p = 0,004). CONCLUSIÓN: El registro EVEREG es una herramienta útil para conocer la situación actual del tratamiento de la hernia incisional. El análisis de los datos señala como principales elementos susceptibles de mejora el bajo índice de seguimiento y la elevada tasa de recurrencias

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to the data from the National Registry of Incisional Hernia (EVEREG) to determine the reality of the treatment of this condition in Spain. METHODS: EVEREG is an online prospective database which has been functioning since July 2012; operations for incisional hernia are anonymously recorded. RESULTS: Up to March 2015, 4501 hernias from 95 of the 113 participating hospitals were registered. The mean age of the patients was 62.7, and 56.5% were women, with a mean BMI of 30.2 kg/m2; 29.8% presented a high surgical risk (ASA III-V). A total of 93.7% were scheduled surgeries, 88.3% open surgery and 22.2% were recurrent incisional hernias. There were 66.9% hernias after a midline laparotomy, and 81.4% of a transverse diameter of less than 10 cm. A mesh was used in 96.2% of cases. Postoperative stay was 5.3 days and 29.1% presented a complication, with a mortality of 0.8%. After a median follow-up of 7.7 months a high rate of recurrence was detected (20.7% per year), especially in hernias that were operated on after a previous repair (18.1% primary vs. 30.6% recurrent; P=.004). CONCLUSION: the EVEREG registry is a useful tool to know the current situation of incisional hernia treatment. Analysis of the data shows several points that could be improved: a low rate of follow-up and high recurrence rate

Initial results of the National Registry of Incisional Hernia. / Resultados iniciales del Registro Español de Hernia Incisional.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to the data from the National Registry of Incisional Hernia (EVEREG) to determine the reality of the treatment of this condition in Spain. METHODS: EVEREG is an online prospective database which has been functioning since July 2012; operations for incisional hernia are anonymously recorded. RESULTS: Up to March 2015, 4501 hernias from 95 of the 113 participating hospitals were registered. The mean age of the patients was 62.7, and 56.5% were women, with a mean BMI of 30.2kg/m2; 29.8% presented a high surgical risk (ASA III-V). A total of 93.7% were scheduled surgeries, 88.3% open surgery and 22.2% were recurrent incisional hernias. There were 66.9% hernias after a midline laparotomy, and 81.4% of a transverse diameter of less than 10cm. A mesh was used in 96.2% of cases. Postoperative stay was 5.3 days and 29.1% presented a complication, with a mortality of 0.8%. After a median follow-up of 7.7 months a high rate of recurrence was detected (20.7% per year), especially in hernias that were operated on after a previous repair (18.1% primary vs. 30.6% recurrent; P=.004). CONCLUSION: the EVEREG registry is a useful tool to know the current situation of incisional hernia treatment. Analysis of the data shows several points that could be improved: a low rate of follow-up and high recurrence rate.

Initial surgical experience in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for middle and lower third rectal cancer: short-term results.

INTRODUCTION: Total mesorectal excision (TME) of the rectum has been advocated as the gold standard surgical treatment of middle and lower third rectal cancer. Laparoscopy has gained acceptance among surgeons in the treatment of colon malignancies, while scepticism exists about laparoscopic TME in terms of safety and its oncological adequacy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of laparoscopic TME on surgical and oncological outcome in a group of consecutive unselected patients. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two patients with middle or inferior rectal cancer were admitted to our unit and underwent TME from December 1998 to February 2008. Eighty-nine patients were approached with laparoscopy. Patients staged cT3/4 cTxN+ or uTxN+ were submitted to neoadjuvant treatment. Postoperative complications and oncological outcomes were registered. RESULTS: In the laparoscopic group 80 anterior resections (including 4 intersphincteric resections and manual colo- anal anastomosis) and 9 abdominal-perineal resections were performed. 33.3% of patients were enrolled in "long-course" neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (partial and complete response rates 88.2% and 11.8%, respectively). Protective lateral ileostomy was performed in 72% of patients. Mean operative time was 254.3+/-38.3 min and mean blood loss was 215+/-180 ml. Conversion rate was 12.7%. Morbidity rate was 39.3% without mortality. The rate of anastomotic leaks was 13.48%, reoperation rate 13.48%, recovery rate 3.1+/-1.4 days and hospital stay 10.4+/-4.6 days. Concerning adequacy of oncologic resection, mean distance of the tumour from the anal verge was 4.3+/-2.2 cm. Nodal sampling of 12.4+/-4.8 were obtained. Six patients (6/89, 6.74%) had a R1 margin: 3 distal and 3 circumferential. Median follow-up was 29 months and local recurrence rate was 5.79%. Four-year cumulative overall survival was 78% and disease-free survival was 63% (Kaplan-Meier method). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic approach for rectal tumour is a technically demanding procedure, but it is oncologically safe.